The Impact of AI in Reducing Biases in Managerial Decision-Making: Towards Organizational Agility and Evidence-Based Leadership

Authors

  • Zakaria Elhabti Kenitra National School of Business and Management, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco Author
  • Said Assal Research Laboratory in Organizational Management Science, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/s3x5xm46

Keywords:

Organizational Agility, Artificial Intelligence, Managerial Decision-Making, Evidence-based Leadership, Explainable AI, Decision Intelligence, Organizational Culture

Abstract

Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, anchoring and overconfidence, represent major challenges for managerial decision-making by impairing rational judgment and leading to suboptimal organizational outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are emerging as a transformative tool for mitigating these biases through objective, transparent, data-driven analysis. Leveraging machine learning, predictive analytics and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), Decision-making can be improvise by these systems reducing reliance on heuristics and offering transparent alternatives that promote evidence-based leadership. Empirical studies demonstrate the effectiveness of AI in a variety of areas, including recruitment, strategic forecasting and supply chain management, where it corrects bias and improves efficiency. Despite this potential, challenges remain, such as algorithmic bias and ethical dilemmas relating to accountability. AI adoption could be this successful as it requires ethical frameworks, hybrid decision models and organizational readiness, including robust data governance and AI literacy. This article synthesizes existing literature to assess the role of AI in reducing managerial bias, its practical applications and implications for promoting an evidence-based leadership culture in dynamic business environments.

References

[1]Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., & Sibony, O. (2011). The big idea: Before you make that big decision. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 50-60.

[2]Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114-126.

[3]Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66-83.

[4]Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.

[5]Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.

[6]Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 98-110.

[7]Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., & Hutchinson, B. (2021). Model cards for model reporting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.

[8]Wang, X., Lin, X., & Shao, B. (2022). How does artificial intelligence create business agility? Evidence from chatbots. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102535. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026840122200069X

[9]Woollacott, E. (2025). Organizations face ticking timebomb over AI governance. IT Pro. https://www.itpro.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/organizations-face-ticking-timebomb-over-ai-governance

[10]Hofstede, G. (2025). The 6 Dimensions Model of national culture by Geert Hofstede. Geert Hofstede. https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/

Downloads

Published

2025-08-08

Issue

Section

Articles